> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://help.tokenpocket.pro/en/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://help.tokenpocket.pro/en/wallet-faq-en/btc-wallet/what-is-bip-177-a-clear-guide-to-bitcoins-unit-redefinition-proposal.md).

# What Is BIP-177? A Clear Guide to Bitcoin's Unit Redefinition Proposal

## Overview: What Is BIP-177?

**BIP-177** (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 177) is a non-consensus proposal introduced by John Carvalho, CEO of Synonym. It aims to **change how Bitcoin units are named and displayed**—not how Bitcoin operates under the hood.

📌 Important: BIP-177 does *not* change Bitcoin’s protocol, total supply, or consensus rules. It only changes how values are presented to users.

***

## Key Changes in BIP-177

### Unit Naming Convention

* Deprecates terms like “satoshi” and “sat”
* Introduces “bitcoin” (lowercase) as the new base unit name

### BTC Value Remains the Same

* 1 BTC = 100,000,000 bitcoins (formerly sats)

### Symbol Support

* Allows using **₿** to represent the base unit\
  (e.g., 0.005 BTC = ₿500,000)

### Dual Format Support

* Supports both:
  * **Decimal style**: 0.00001 BTC
  * **Integer-only style**: 1,000 bitcoins

## Top 3 Benefits of BIP-177

### 1. Reduces Cognitive Load

Using decimal places like 0.000023 BTC is difficult to read, especially for newcomers. Integer values like "2,300 bitcoins" are much easier to interpret.

> **Example:**\
> Before: 0.000023 BTC\
> After: 2,300 bitcoins

### 2. Eases Unit Anxiety

People often feel discouraged when they can’t afford “a full BTC.” With BIP-177, owning thousands of bitcoins (base units) sounds more empowering and accessible.

> **Example:**\
> Before: I only have 0.00002 BTC\
> After: I own 2,000 bitcoins

### 3. Simplifies the User Experience

By removing the need to switch between BTC and sats, BIP-177 creates a unified, intuitive way of expressing value in Bitcoin.

## Community Reactions to BIP-177

### Critics argue:

* Removing “satoshi” erases homage to Bitcoin’s creator
* The term “bitcoin” could now mean both BTC and its smallest unit, creating potential confusion

### Supporters believe:

* It aligns better with Bitcoin’s integer-based design
* It makes Bitcoin pricing feel more approachable
* It improves accessibility for global mass adoption

***

## Final Thoughts: Is BIP-177 the Future?

While **BIP-177** is still just a proposal, it highlights a growing need: **making Bitcoin easier to understand and use for everyone**. It doesn’t change Bitcoin’s value or technology—just how it’s displayed. As Bitcoin matures, user-friendly proposals like BIP-177 could play a vital role in adoption.